Speech event analysis of President Prabowo’s statement on the August 2025 protests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33751/albion.v8i1.34Abstract
This study analyzes President Prabowo Subianto’s speeches delivered in response to the August 2025 demonstrations in Indonesia using Dell Hymes’s SPEAKING framework. The background of this research arises from the growing importance of speech event analysis in understanding how political leaders communicate during social crises. The study aims to identify how each SPEAKING component appears in Prabowo’s statements and how these speech events illustrate the communicative function of language amid public unrest. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, the data were drawn from official video recordings and verified transcripts, then coded and interpreted systematically. The findings show that Prabowo’s speeches apply structured participation, directive and commissive acts, and deliberate keying to calm the public, legitimize state authority, and distinguish peaceful aspirations from unlawful behavior. This research demonstrates the role of speech events as social acts that influence public perception, support political stability, and guide crisis communication.
References
Aisyah, A., & Rosalina, S. (2022). Analysis of representative speaking actions in the video “Racist for Us Both” on Gita Savitri Devi YouTube channel (Sociolinguistic study). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal). https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6110
Amin, A. (2020). Attitude towards language in sociolinguistic settings: A brief overview. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 2(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v2i1.3758
Ayton, J., Tsindos, T., & Berkovic, D. (2023). Qualitative research: A practical guide for health and social care researchers and practitioners. Allen & Unwin.
Coombs, W. T. (2015). The value of communication during a crisis: Insights from strategic communication research. Business Horizons, 58(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.10.003
Diani, A., Rejeki, S., & Taufik, M. (2021). Language variation of the main character in the movie Black Panther (2018). Journal Albion: Journal of English Literature, Language, and Culture, 3(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.33751/albion.v3i1.3347
Hymes, D. (2020). The scope of sociolinguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2020(263), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2084
Kiesling, S. F. (2007). Men, masculinities, and language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00035.x
Kiyançi̇çek, E., & Karatepe, Ç. (2023). The analysis of a textbook activity on suggestions according to Hymes’ speaking framework and its adaptation. Kapadokya Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 28–48.
Lauder, M. R., Yuwono, U., & Kushartanti. (2009). Pesona bahasa: Langkah awal memahami linguistik. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Nisa, L. K., Tadjuddin, S., & Ekowati, S. H. (n.d.). Analysis of the relevance of Hymes’ theory to language learning through film. https://doi.org/10.26618/9wa2ry89
Nisa, L. K., Tadjuddin, S., & Ekowati, S. H. (2025). Speech events in the Indonesian version of Miracle in Cell No. 7 and YouTube discussion pages: A digital communication context analysis using Dell Hymes’ “SPEAKING” model. Tamaddun, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v24i1.952
Noy, C. (2017). Ethnography of communication. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0089
Rojo-Laurilla, M. A. (2022). A qualitative analysis of meetings in a New Zealand and an Australian work environment using Dell Hymes’ ethnography of speaking framework. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.59588/2961-3094.1003
Said, U. M. R., Arsyad, H., Haidar, A., & Al Farisi, M. Z. (2024). Politeness in language and speech events in war situations: Analysis of Abu Ubaidah’s speech. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya, 14(1), 104–125. https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.14.1.2024.104-125
Sankar, K. (2022). A theoretical review: Sociolinguistics in second language education. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(1), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.71.28
Saputra, E. (2025, August). Pidato lengkap Prabowo menyikapi demo berujung penjarahan. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/politik/pidato-lengkap-prabowo-menyikapi-demo-berujung-penjarahan-2065173
Setiawan, M., Madjid, V., & Zahwa. (2025, September 1). Ini 10 poin pernyataan Presiden Prabowo bersama ketum partai soal demo. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20250901074652-4-663060/ini-10-poin-pernyataan-presiden-prabowo-bersama-ketum-partai-soal-demo
Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and management. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(3). https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456
van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 62–86). SAGE Publications.
Wahana Putra, K. W., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2023). Ethnography of communication: Messages analysis encountered in Cenk Blonk using Dell Hymes’ speaking theory. Lingua Scientia, 30(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.23887/ls.v30i1.58408
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal Albion : Journal of English Literature, Language, and Culture
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
